How to Live: 27 conflicting answers and one weird conclusion

 
　　在這本奇特而迷人的作品中，每一章都告訴你一個過好人生的原則，但每一章也都看似與下一章的準則互相矛盾。
 
　　其中一章主張你該完全獨立、保持對所有選項的開放態度，另一章則認為你該對一樣職業、一個地方、一個人全心投入；一章說服你要活在當下，認真體驗每一刻，另一章則鼓勵你延遲享樂、放眼未來。
 
　　所以，到底哪一章說的才是正確的？答案是──他們全部都是對的。

Not quite non-fiction, not quite self-help. It's a work of art about conflicting philosophies.
 
Many books believe they know how you should live. But each book disagrees with the next. In "How to Live", each chapter believes it knows how you should live. And each chapter disagrees with the next.
 
One chapter makes a compelling argument for why you should be completely independent, keeping all options open. The next chapter argues why you should commit to one career, one place, and one person.
 
One chapter persuades you to be fully present, and experience each moment. The next, to delay gratification and invest for the future.
 
Which one is right? Which does the author believe? All of them. It's a philosophy of conflicting philosophies.
 
A very unique and thought-provoking book. Meant for reflection as much as instruction.